The provider notes that decide who is eligible.
A patient-to-trial matching platform that builds a comprehensive health profile to match patients to trials.
Matches stall on the data the feeds cannot reach.
An accurate match depends on a comprehensive profile, and the weakest link is provider-note coverage. Existing vendors force a trade-off between expensive high-hit-rate options and cheaper ones that are unreliable at the provider-note step.
Exchange and EHR data alone are not enough: small independent practices are underrepresented, and coding is inconsistent, so the data cannot be trusted on its own. Many exclusion criteria are downstream of medications and notes, so incomplete records directly block determining who is eligible.
Filling the long tail the feeds miss.
Hubble reaches connected systems through direct integrations and HIE, then uses voice agents for the small independent practices and browser agents for the mid-size clinics with patient portals, the long tail those feeds miss, retrieving the provider notes matching depends on.
Retrieval runs on the platform's existing patient e-signature authorization, and because it is agent-driven there is no team manually calling and faxing. Records come back normalized so medication lists can be validated across sources.
What Hubble delivered
- Voice agents for small, independent practices
- Browser agents for clinics with patient portals
- Direct EHR and HIE retrieval where the systems are connected
- Cross-source normalization to validate medication lists
- Runs on the platform's own patient consent, delivered by API
What changed after Hubble.
Want results like this?
Bring a use case. We will walk through how it maps to the platform.